Shake-up of council infrastructure funding announced

There are a few big reasons I want to be involved in the local body election campaign, and I haven’t looked past the campaign itself really.
There’s so much silly talk being talked, especially in Whakatane with the kind of nonsense being floated. I’ll go into those in greater detail as the campaign proper heats up but the usual suspects spouting off about the reasons rates are so unaffordable does my head in. I was asked what my main issue was, and I said it was government giving local councils responsibilities but not funding them properly. The local wags here assured me this was a ‘fatal flaw’ as they instead demanded we copy Wellington’s Public Service cuts that have seen our hospital come to near collapse.
But here we have the government telling us they acknowledge the funding shortfall and are keen to find ways to fix it.
There are numerous problems facing councils, ours especially so, but we aren’t going to find the answers asking dumb questions. We’ll just get more dumb answers. The way to get the right answers is to ask the right questions.
And I’m going to keep asking the right questions.
If Wellington wants us to do their work, show me the money.
======
The government has announced changes to make it easier for local councils to finance the infrastructure needed to support local housing growth.

That’s things like sewage lines and local streets.

In a speech to the Local Government New Zealand conference on Friday, Infrastructure Minister Chris Bishop, said councils not zoning enough housing land was one problem, but so is the cost of infrastructure to support housing expansion.

A regulator will be set up to govern new pre-set levies – replacing ‘Development Contributions’ that currently don’t allow councils to recover the full costs of associated infrastructure.

Ratepayers have been left picking up the bill instead of the beneficiaries of the infrastructure, Bishop said.

“Put simply, you can’t have housing without land, water, transport, and other community infrastructure. It’s a package,” he said.

“However, under the status quo, councils and developers face significant challenges to fund and finance enabling infrastructure for housing.”

Bishop said it’s crucial the country move to a system where a “responsive supply of infrastructure” is funded to make it “commercially viable to build new houses”.

“This will shift market expectations of future scarcity, bring down the cost of land for new housing, and improve incentives to develop land sooner instead of land banking.”

On Thurday, Bishop announced five key changes to infrastructure funding settings that he says will get more houses built:

  • The first is replacing Development Contributions with a Development Levy System
  • The second is establishing regulatory oversight of Development Levies to ensure charges are fair and appropriate
  • The third is increasing the flexibility of targeted rates
  • The fourth is improving the Infrastructure Funding and Financing Act, and
  • The fifth is broadening existing tools to support value capture

“Under this new system, councils and other infrastructure providers will be able to charge developers for their share of aggregate infrastructure growth costs across an urban area over the long-term,” Bishop said.

“Development Levies will provide far more flexibility for councils and other infrastructure providers to recover costs for any in-sequence development – whether it planned and costed, or not.”

Leave a Reply